MOVIES!

MOVIES!

Sunday, November 6, 2016

Movie Review: Doctor Strange

DISCLAIMER: All images and videos used in this review are property of their respective owners.



Doctor Stephen Strange: A man of medicine and healing, a neurosurgeon without compare, and a bit of an egomaniac. His career takes a nosedive however when a car accident leaves his hands shattered and unusable. After modern medicine has failed him, he travels to Nepal and arrives at a place called Kamar-Taj, where he discovers a sorceress known only as "The Ancient One". She thrusts the good doctor into a fantastical new realm where he needs to forget everything he once knew and to start over. Doctor Strange will emerge from this experience to become something more...magical...


In the eight years of the Marvel Cinematic Universe spread across films, TV shows, and Netflix, we've witnessed quite a variety of superhero stories. From the technology and modern world of Iron Man, to WWII & Captain America, to Thor & Viking myths, to space & the Guardians of the Galaxy. We've seen Ant-Man in a heist film, The Avengers assembling to fight threats and each other, the Agents of SHIELD in spy stories, to the dark underbelly of New York with Daredevil, Jessica Jones and Luke Cage. It's no surprise then that they've decided to tap into yet another side of the comics that hasn't been seen yet: the magical and the mystical, the weird and wondrous. And who better to showcase this than Marvel's go-to guy for magical maladies and mysteries, the Sorcerer Supreme Doctor Strange?



The good Doctor made his debut in July 1963's Strange Tales #110. Unusually for many of the Marvel heroes that got adapted so far, Stan Lee didn't have a lot of involvement in this particular character. Instead, artist Steve Ditko (Co-creator of Spider-Man) is the main man behind Doctor Strange. Inspired by the likes of The Cabinet of Doctor Caligari and various Eastern philosophies and mysticism, the comics lived up to the character's namesake. The stories, combined with psychedelic visuals and larger than life adventures, were an instant hit that particularly resonated with the 1960's counterculture, lasting to today where he continued his role as the Sorcerer Supreme and watchdog against other dimensional threats towards the Earth.

I myself never really heard of this character until the 2000's through word of mouth. I never read any of his comics, knew nothing about his story and characters, until curiosity through cartoon & video game appearances led me to look up more about him. So by the time the Marvel Cinematic Universe became a thing, Doctor Strange was one of my top picks to see adapted and was delighted when his movie was officially announced in 2013 as the 14th movie in the MCU.



All in all I really enjoyed this, both as an MCU movie and general cinematic experience. I daresay that this is one of the few times that I was tempted to actually watch it in 3D despite my disdain for it. Alas I opted not too since I'm such a nerd that I wanted to actually care about the story and characters beyond pretty pictures.

The story is actually very familiar in a lot of ways, which is ironic given the title character. It follows the standard MCU formula we've gotten used to by now for many of the characters; their background, their craft, the circumstances for them going down the path of a hero, the villains they fight, the stakes that are raised, seeing our hero kick ass & take names, and set up events for future stories. I'm not sure if this qualifies as a bad thing because I'm a sucker for these types of stories and anything involving Joseph Campbell's Hero's Journey. I suppose that if you tire of this, perhaps visuals might be the way to go, but I'll talk about that in a bit.

Stephen Strange (Benedict Cumberbatch) is a good character, and I'll be going into him quite a bit since he'll most certainly be back for future movies. He reminds me a bit of Tony Stark, except not quite that much of an egomaniac. He most certainly believes in his superiority, but unlike genius billionaire Tony Stark, Stephen Strange is a neurosurgeon and a damn good one. We see him back up his talents by saving a patient that has already been declared brain-dead, and being so at ease with his work that he casually talks music trivia during his procedures. His arrogance is also on display when his colleague/love interest notes how he saves others just to better himself, and see him reject various cases for more difficult ones to challenge himself and improve his reputation, so when he gets into his accident it almost seems cathartic.

Once we see him arrive at Kamar-Taj and become involved in the mystic arts, we see a slight shift in his character. Getting flung across time and space by the Ancient One and getting stranded on Mt. Everest most certainly humbles him, but his quick learning and desire to go beyond and question his lessons shows that his arrogance and ego are still strong. Once he discovers the true extent of the mystic arts and what he must do, he finally learns one of the most important lessons of the Ancient One: He tempered his ego, gave himself to the flow of the river, and learned to control it and ascend. By the end of the movie he may still snark, but it is tempered by his duty and new responsibilities as the premier sorcerer of Earth.


The rest of the protagonists are pretty basic or don't have much to go for them. Christine Palmer (Rachel McAdams) is Strange's colleague and love interest. She's the "audience surrogate", a stand in for us experiencing all the weirdness that Strange eventually shows her. Mordo (Chiwetel Ejiofor) is the one that brings Strange to Kamar-Taj and is shown to be a firm believer in the Ancient One's teachings and the roles of a sorcerer. His strong, if immovable, belief would become a problem by the end of the movie and set things up for the future. Wong (Benedict Wong) is the super-serious guardian of the magical scrolls and texts. And naturally he's a punch line for modern and pop culture jokes. Finally there's Doctor Strange's mentor, The Ancient One (Tilda Swinton). Like any good mentor character, she dispenses wisdom and teachings that are rooted in real world practice and can be applied to our everyday lives, has more secrets than she lets on, and when forced to take action she can kick all kinds of ass.


One of the deserved criticisms of the MCU is its lack of compelling, interesting, and long-lasting villains. Loki of the Thor movies really is the best of the bunch, while the rest are either underdeveloped, boring, super-serious stick-in-the-muds, or are a one-trick pony. While I don't feel that any of the other villains are awful, there are a few that are definitely at the far end of quality.

Kaecilius (Mads Mikkelsen) in my opinion falls somewhere in the good pile, but just barely. On one hand, he's yet another villain that turned bad because of the misguided actions of the mentor character. We've seen something similar in Iron Man 1, Iron Man 3, Avengers: Age of Ultron, and Ant-Man. He's also a villain that's rather one-note and doesn't end up doing much to contribute to the climax and just getting tossed aside. What pushes him to being one of the better villains for me are two things:

1. He's a legitimate threat. While he may be yet another villain with the same power source as the heroes (Iron Man trilogy, The Incredible Hulk, Thor 1, Captain America 1, Avengers: Age of Ultron, Ant-Man), I can let it slide here because of the infinite possibilities with spells and sorcery. He poses enough of a problem for our hero that he had to resort to less-than-legal means in order to finally do him in.

2. His dry humor in small doses. Kaecilius straddles the line between super-serious stick-in-the-mud villain and overly-jokey never-shut-up villain. He's not throwing out quips nor ends up like Wong where jokes fall flat on him. Instead his humor comes from his nonchalant reaction to Strange's attempts to try and get the better of him.

But of course, what makes Doctor Strange stand out amidst its MCU brethren are the visual effects. It is definitely a movie that must be seen on a big screen to be fully appreciated, whether in standard 2D or in 3D/Imax. Director Scott Derrickson cited influences like Steve Ditko's visuals in the comics, M.C. Escher, and Inception to allow reality to be warped in all kinds of strange ways. Watching the movie and seeing cities get reshaped, building interiors looking like kaleidoscopes and hallways with endless and infinite depth really makes for one trippy and exciting flick. Even taking those aside, Doctor Strange also opens the possibility of different dimensions, and we're given a taste of that when Strange is sent on a joy ride through the multiverse by The Ancient One, seeing something that's most likely inspired by Stanley Kubrick's 2001: A Space Odyssey.

The strange visuals in turn also provides us something different as far as the action scenes go. We've gotten used to the idea of magical action being similar to Harry Potter, with magic bolts or whathaveyou being flung back and forth by our heroes and villains. It can definitely get boring after a while. In this film the magic is derived less from spells and more from the alteration of reality and nature, allowing for very unique fights that we haven't seen in MCU movies before. At various points in the movie, martial arts are also involved with the usage of wirework and making it a little Wuxia-ish or similar to The Matrix.

FINAL THOUGHTS

All in all, Doctor Strange is definitely a delight to watch. It's not going to profoundly change your life, but it most certainly will entertain you. A combination of the old and familiar and the addition of some fantastical visuals will keep you in your seats and away from boredom, and the possibility of seeing these visuals on the big screen again and various plot points and character revelations will also invest you for a possible sequel. As a standalone comic book superhero movie, it gets high marks and has enough in it to entertain the average movie-goer or for those interested in seeing something out of this world on the large silver screen. On its own, I give it a solid 4/5.

As a movie in the Marvel Cinematic Universe, however, it's trickier. It certainly did an important and effective job with introducing a new side of this world that we haven't seen yet, and it's strong enough to be necessary on its own unlike say Thor: The Dark World, but because it's an origin story and introduction to a new major player for the rest of Phase 3, it needed to introduce a lot. There are still possibilities left untapped, stories still untold, and character evolution that is just waiting to happen, but we likely won't be getting that for another few years since the MCU movie slate for Phase 3 is set until 2018. It's definitely great, but it's still our introduction. It still earns points for being different enough from the likes of Iron Man, Thor and Captain America. As such, compared with the other 13 movies of the MCU, I give it 3/5.

And so ends 2016's MCU movies. Looking forward to 2017's Guardians of the Galaxy: Volume 2, Spider-Man: Homecoming, and Thor: Ragnarok.


TRAILER THOUGHTS

Dreamworks' Trolls: Not impressed, and baffled that the studio that's famous for the likes of How to Train Your Dragon and Kung Fu Panda can make something like this. Also adds to my personal annoyance of nostalgia-pandering by basing something off of another 90's property. Wake me up when we hear news on How to Train Your Dragon 3.

Disney's Pirates of the Carribean: Dead Men Tell No Tales: Might be good, but the teaser alone doesn't really get me interested. Plus, kind of burnt out on POTC after the lackluster On Stranger Tides. Count me among those people who felt it should've ended after At World's End.

Rogue One: A Star Wars Story: I'm deliberately keeping away from any trailers or news in order to be surprised as much as possible when this hits theaters, so I was blown away by all this stuff in the newest trailer. Definitely hyped for December.

Disney's Moana: Massively excited for this one since Disney has been on a great roll lately with their original animated films. The Polynesian setting with the ocean is sure to make for some interesting visuals and storytelling opportunities with the characters of Moana and Maui. I'm also happy that this isn't a stupid comedic trailer that Disney's marketing just annoyingly loves to do a lot of times. I'm looking at you, teaser trailers for Tangled and Frozen.

Tuesday, June 7, 2016

Facebook Archive January-May 2016

The final entry in my archiving: My FB posts of the first half of 2016.

Music review: The Beatles: Please Please Me (1/9/16)
I recently started listening to the 12 "core" albums of The Beatles again, and now I remember why I love this group so much. As such, I'll give my brief thoughts on each of these 12 "core" albums.
First up is Please Please Me, released in 1963. Though the songs here may sound very basic compared to what they'd create later on, there's just a sense of energy and sheer fun listening to this album. The Fab Four originally recorded this in one day, completely high on creativity, and you can just feel it when you listen to this album.
Best song of the album: Hard to say, as there are so many good tracks. I'd put it as a 4-way tie between "I Saw Her Standing There", "Boys", "Please Please Me", and "Twist & Shout".
Worst song of the album: I don't find any of them bad, but I'm rather indifferent towards "A Taste of Honey" and "There's a Place".

Movie review: The Peanuts Movie (1/10/16)
A very enjoyable movie that captures the feel and essence of the Peanuts while taking advantage of a rather unique style of mixing 2D hand drawn animation and 3D CGI. Its story is very simplistic, but then that is what Peanuts is best known for. All the characters you know and love are there, there's a lot of very heartwarming moments with Charlie Brown, and is a great introduction for the newcomers who've only heard of these characters, and a delectable treat for the vets who've read and seen everything that's come before.
I'm also just happy that we've gotten yet another adaptation done right, after the horrible Dr. Seuss movies, Smurfs, and Alvin & the Chipmunks movies. I highly recommend seeing it over this weekend if you're already sick of Star Wars.

Music Review: The Beatles: With the Beatles (1/10/16)
Released also in 1963, With the Beatles is very reminiscent of Please Please Me in a lot of elements, from the simplistic yet charming original compositions, self-identifiable cover songs, to the domination of the theme of "love" throughout the album.
Please Please Me & With the Beatles seem to be a great representation of the band's early days and the beginnings of the Beatlemania period. The mixture of raw youthful energy, simplistic charm, and unaltered sound is perfect for your nostalgic dance party and reminiscing of early 1960's rock.
Best: It Won't Be Long, All My Loving, Till There Was You, Please Mister Postman, Money
Worst: Again, none are particular bad, but I'm indifferent to Little Child, You Really Got a Hold on Me and I Wanna Be Your Man

Music Review: The Beatles: A Hard Day's Night (1/16/16)
Released in 1964, I see A Hard Day's Night as one of the best albums of the entire Beatles discography. Consisting of completely original songs & no covers, an iconic opening guitar chord, produced at the zenith of worldwide Beatlemania, and made in conjunction with the titular movie, there is almost nothing wrong with A Hard Day's Night...
...well, except for a lack of Ringo singing, which is a bit of a shame since he's my personal favorite Beatle for childhood reasons.
Best songs: A Hard Day's Night, I Should Have Known Better, And I Love Her, Can't Buy Me Love, Things We Said Today, You Can't Do That, I'll Be Back
The rest of the songs I didn't mention aren't bad, but I just like them less. In comparison to the previous two albums, there aren't any that I'm indifferent towards, which is a testament to its creativity.

Music Review: The Beatles: Beatles for Sale (1/17/16)
"The weary faces on the cover of the next British LP, Beatles for Sale, showed that Beatlemania was taking its toll".
-Malcolm McDowell, The Compleat Beatles, 1982

Comparing this to A Hard Day's Night is like comparing night and day. Whereas A Hard Day's Night was all original songs, Beatles for Sale went back to having cover songs. While there was a sense of youthful optimism in A Hard Day's Night, cynicism and pessimism seemingly dominated Beatles for Sale.
This is an uneven album for me, and its one of the few albums of the discography where I outright just skip songs. The original material and the covers have their share of good songs, while others are just...there. Despite this, the album is a continuing sign of the Beatles' maturing creativity. They are slowly moving away from the fresh-faced mop top era of Beatlemania and beginning the transition into the mid-era of the band's creative history.
Best songs: No Reply, I'm a Loser, Baby's in Black, Rock and Roll Music, I'll Follow the Sun, Mr. Moonlight, Eight Days a Week
Worst songs: Whenever I listen to the album, I just outright skip Kansas City, Words of Love, Honey Don't, Every Little Thing, What You're Doing, and Everbody's Trying to Be My Baby

Music Review: The Beatles: Help! (1/24/16)
Much like Beatles for Sale, I tend to skip songs in this 5th entry in the Beatles Album Canon. Out of all their albums, this is probably the one I'm least familiar with, and I think it's mostly because this album contains three of the major iconic Beatles songs. They kinda overshadow almost everything else in the album.
Help! is probably my least favorite of the "core" discography. It just feels like a "filler" album compared to what'll be coming from the future. Heck, that's probably the best way to sum up Beatles for Sale and Help!: Filler. Has some good material in there, but is ultimately not anything special compared to what has come before...and what will be coming in the future. The maturation of the Fab Four's creative abilities continues, and will truly manifest in the next album, the one that marks the end of the Beatlemania era and marks the beginning of a new phase of the Beatles.
Best songs: Help!, Ticket to Ride, Yesterday
Worst songs: Another Girl, Act Naturally, Dizzy Miss Lizzy

Music Review: The Beatles: Past Masters I (1/25/16)
In-between the releases of "Please Please Me" to "Help!", there were the singles that weren't included on any albums. These singles from 1963-early 1965 would be complied into "Past Masters I", and are just as important as the core albums.
Because this is a compilation of songs over the years, I'll instead be ranking each of the singles from best to worst, from top to bottom. Songs that have corresponding album versions won't be included, and I won't include the German translations of two of them because they are just simply translations.
1. I Want To Hold Your Hand
2. I Feel Fine
3. From Me To You
4. She Loves You
5. Yes It Is
6. Bad Boy
7. This Boy
8. I'll Get You
9. I Call Your Name
10 Thank You Girl
11. I'm Down
12. Matchbox
13. Long Tall Sally
14. She's a Woman
15. Slow Down

Music Review: The Beatles: Rubber Soul (1/30/16)
And so we reach 1965's Rubber Soul...the end of the Beatlemania era, and the blueprint of the style that will dominate The Beatles for the future albums to come.
I previously mentioned how "A Hard Day's Night" and "Beatles For Sale" were practically antithetical to one another. Well, Rubber Soul, with its 14 songs, can be seen as the antithesis to the Beatlemania era as a whole. The wide-eyed romantic, energetic and bouncy feeling of their earlier songs has evolved into sort of a more sophisticated display of artistry. This would be the beginning when the Beatles would shed their status as a pop boy band, and take their first steps into musical godhood.
Best songs: Drive My Car, Norwegian Wood, Nowhere Man, Michelle, Girl, I'm Looking Through You, In My Life
Worst songs: Wait, Run For Your Life

Movie Review: The 5th Wave (1/31/16)
A rather decent post-apocalyptic flick. I was actually surprised during the credits to find that it's yet another movie based off a YA novel, but that certainly does explain why the movie was paced like it was.
Casting, acting and story were all fine, though I did groan at a few of the typical cliches they employed in the story, and shook my head at one particular part of the movie that we've been told way too many times before. Fortunately it was just a line in-passing and not a major part of the story.
I'm hoping that this will make enough money that a sequel will happen because by the end I actually was invested in the story and characters. All in all, not too bad.

Movie Review: Deadpool (2/14/16)
I'm only a casual fan of this fairly-recent Marvel character, so all I know of the basics of Deadpool is that he's a wisecracking chatterbox mercenary with a penchant for killing, never picking sides, fictional-character awareness, and fourth-wall breaking. So at first, I was hesitant to see this one, not even bothering to give the trailers a watch.
I was happy to find a superhero movie that took advantage of its R rating, showed Deadpool being his Deadpool-y self, and had tons of typical & violent action. But what made this work just so good is that it had a quite a lot of heart into it. For all of Deadpool's insanity and antics, he's deep down a good guy, and you feel for his suffering, dilemma, and whenever something bad happens to him. The story was also very down to earth, which is a breath of fresh air after the tons of superhero movies that always had huge, world-ending stakes. Deadpool is just focused on one simple goal in the movie, and its easy to follow his struggle while being entertained by the sheer amount of humor in this movie. Childish humor, dirty humor, referential humor...I say there's just about every kind of humor that can please everybody.
If I had one criticism, it's that Deadpool is not quite as insane as he normally would be as seen in the comics, but my guess is that they don't want to play their hand too soon or risk throwing so much that the audience wouldn't accept it. But what we did get was just as good in its own right, and I await the sequel.
All in all, a great start to 2016's superhero movies. And per the norm, stay until the end of the credits.

Music Review: The Beatles: Revolver (2/15/16)
1966's Revolver, like Rubber Soul, is another album that would lay the groundwork for the rest of the Beatles discography. But while Rubber Soul's groundwork is in the songs, Revolver's groundwork is in the compositions. By this point, the Beatles had all but left the touring scene, so they were free to try some fancy-schmancy studio techniques to enhance their songs. It may be difficult to appreciate this now, but at the time, many of these techniques were extremely innovative and fresh. Oh, and did I mention, drugs factored into the creation of some of the songs, too?
The end result is an album that may seem like it doesn't know what mood it wants to be, but I feel that it's very symbolic and poignant. It exemplifies how the songwriting was reaching new heights beyond the almost superficial qualities of the early years. Don't get me wrong, the early years were great, but there's a reason many consider the middle/late era of the Beatles to be the zenith of the creativity.
All in all, a great album and definitely one of my favorites. We'll see the continuing zenith next time...with one of the most iconic and important albums of all time.
Best songs: Taxman, Eleanor Rigby, Here There & Everywhere, Yellow Submarine, Got to Get You Into My Life, Tomorrow Never Knows
Worst songs: None. The rest of the songs are good, I just like them less than the aforementioned ones.

Music Review: The Beatles: Sgt. Pepper's Lonely Hearts Club Band
We've now reached the legendary Sgt. Pepper's Lonely Hearts Club Band. This 1967 album is considered by many to be the greatest work of the Beatles, a symbol of the late 60's counterculture, and the highest high of the Beatles using the combination of musical talents and studio wizardry.
While I certainly can agree with the latter two sentiments, I personally don't see it as the Beatles' best. In fact, and I'm ready to get tomatoes in the face for this, I find the album rather overrated when stacked with the rest of their discography. I don't particularly care for Paul McCartney's idea of taking on alter-egos for the making of the album, and there are times when the studio fiddly bits seem a little bit of a hindrance to the songs. And while I said that the previous album, Revolver, was fine for having a disunity with its songs, the attempt of unity for Sgt. Pepper falls flat. Only the beginning and ending of the album songs sound like they're part of the same batch, the rest of them can belong on any of the other albums seen after Sgt. Pepper's.
But still, credit where its due. Most of the songs are still excellent and iconic, some of them definitely couldn't be done justice without the studio to back them up, and the music industry has indeed been changed forever after this album. It's a good album in its own right and certainly deserves to be listed among the greats. But in comparison to the rest of the Beatles Discography, there are some albums that I feel that are better than this one.
Best songs: With a Little Help from my Friends, Lucy in the Sky with Diamonds, She's Leaving Home, Being for the Benefit of Mr. Kite, When I'm 64, A Day in the Life
Worst songs: Fixing a Hole, Lovely Rita, Sgt. Pepper's Lonely Heart's Club Band Reprise

Movie Review: Zootopia (2/22/16)
This movie, by all accounts, should not have been good at all. It features the hackneyed elements of talking anthropomorphic animals, a buddy-cop dynamic, a detective story, and messages of prejudice and racism. Yet, either by some miracle or just genuinely good & clever production, Zootopia managed to combine all these aspects and give us yet another feather in the cap that continues Disney's winning streak that began with Princess & the Frog.
The strength of this movie lies in the characters, story, and setting. Having it take place in an environmentally-varied animal metropolis gives us tons of setups for jokes, plot opportunities, and is actually a major part of the message of the movie. The two protagonists play off each other perfectly and are good characters in their own right. Judy Hopps I think is one of the best non-Princess protagonists of any Disney movie I've seen a while. She may be kind and naive, but she is determined, smart, and more than deserves to wear a police badge and make her new home a better place. Nick Wylde may be your cliched jerk with a heart of gold, but he has no bad intentions and has one thing in common with Judy; both are victims of a system that's examined and dissected throughout the movie.
Then we have the story, and its subsequent message. It continues Disney's newfound creativity of playing against expectations and challenging its own ideals. The story has some twists that some may see coming, but it doesn't make it any less surprising, and the message is one that takes advantage of its animal setting. It's both a timely and timeless message that is very easy to forget these days, and yet it doesn't in any way become preachy or talk down to us as if we were babies. The anthropomorphic setting may seem like it's just for the sake of animal-human jokes, but it is also a metaphor for the world today. Frankly, without the setting, the movie would have been weaker.
If I had one nitpick, it's that the climax could've been a bit stronger. But besides that I don't have that much bad to say about the movie. So, in comparison to the other 54 main Disney movies out there, I give Zootopia a 4.5/5. It frankly should've been a flop with so many things against it, yet it turned out to be one of the best Disney movies since 2009. The only reason I wouldn't rate it a perfect 5 is because while Zootopia is great, I still think that there are a few other Disney movies that are better. Well done Disney. Your 55th big movie has definitely been a success.

Music Review: The Beatles: Magical Mystery Tour (2/28/16)
Not much I think I can say about this 1967 entry in the Beatles Discography. Some songs are good, some songs are bad, overall it's decent. I suppose it's nice that they continued to use the techniques that were started in Sgt. Pepper's...which I guess is the underlying problem here. It feels like it's an echo of Sgt. Pepper's, almost like a part 2 if you will.
I think it's because that this album consists of 5 singles that were released and produced earlier than the initial 6 songs made for the album. As a result, there's almost a sense of incompleteness to this one. Really, you could've just put the 5 singles on one of the Past Masters, put the 6 original songs on Sgt. Pepper's, and nothing of value would be lost.
Best songs: Fool on the Hill, I Am the Walrus, Strawberry Fields Forever, Penny Lane, All You Need is Love
Worst songs: Flying, Blue Jay Way, Baby You're a Rich Man

Music Review: The Beatles: Yellow Submarine (3/5/16)
I think, out of all the albums, this is the hardest one to evaluate. The one I have in my possession is apparently one version of the album, which is the "Songtrack album". This one contains all the Beatles songs that were played in the movie, while the "actual album" version contains only the entirely new songs and the instrumental soundtrack of the movie.
In that regard, it should not even count as an album. Heck, sources say that the only reason this album came about is for contractual reasons and not because of any creative drive. But the fact that there are only four new songs, while the rest was filled with either song repeats or instrumentals, just goes to show that, like Magical Mystery Tour, this is an album that could be removed and it wouldn't make a difference. Heck it has even less going for it than Magical Mystery Tour because of the smaller amount of actual new material.
Because of all that, I'll just be judging this album solely on the four original songs.
Best songs: Hey Bulldog, All Together Now
Worst songs: Only a Northern Song, It's All Too Much

Music Review: The Beatles: The White Album (3/6/16)
The Beatles, AKA The White Album, is a misnomer. A more appropriate title of this album is "John Lennon, Paul McCartney, George Harrison & Ringo Starr."
For anyone not familiar with Beatles history, this 1968 release is pretty much the beginning of the end of the band. A combination of new mindsets, emerging individual styles, the formation of the Apple Corps company, and tensions caused by John and a certain Yoko Ono resulted in an album that is extremely unfocused, erratic, disorganized, and just all over the place. Even more damning is that, unlike everything else that came before, it was a four-sided album (2 CDs today). It's really telling that, out of the 30 songs in this album, roughly half of them consisted of the Fab Four actually being four musicians. Heck, there a few tracks on there that just make you wonder "What the hell were they thinking?!".
So, yeah, not a fan of this one, which is a shame since this was the last album my Dad and I got to complete our collection. To its credit, there are still some very good songs on the album, and it consists of IMO George Harrison's best song EVER, but it's offset by some tracks that are either average, lame, or just awful.
Best songs: Back in the USSR, While my Guitar Gently Weeps, Blackbird, Sexy Sadie, Helter Skelter, Revolution
Worst songs: Wild Honey Pie, Martha My Dear, Why Don't We Do It In the Road?, Yer Blues, Long Long Long, Revolution 9

Movie Review: Kung Fu Panda 3 (3/13/16)
Kung Fu Panda is my second favorite Dreamworks property (#1 being How to Train Your Dragon), so I was eager to see how the third movie would play out after the smash hits of the first and second movie.
To my delight the third movie was, to paraphrase the (lame) Kung Fu Panda TV show, awesomeness. Everything you loved about the previous movies stays true: characters, humor, animation, and music. The story is also a great continuation as we see the character of Po take his next step: becoming a master, rediscovering his people, and has a great story angle: how can you be a good chosen one? This goes hand-in-hand with the message of the movie, which is to be the best person you can be. You may have inspirations in your life that guide, but they ultimately shape your own unique self.
If I had a nitpick, it's that some parts of the climax could've been better, and the villain, while entertaining and hilarious, isn't quite as menacing as the peacock villain of Kung Fu Panda 2. But those are only minor detriments. All in all, Kung Fu Panda 3 is a great movie for the family, where it has just about enough for every viewer. If this really will be the final movie, then I felt it ended on a high note.

Music Review: The Beatles: Abbey Road (3/19/16)
The twilight years of the Beatles were...unpleasant to say the least, what with the band being split apart by bad business decisions, creative differences, failed projects, and the death of their longtime manager Brian Epstein. Post-Sgt. Pepper, the likes of Magical Mystery Tour, Yellow Submarine, and The White Album were released with mixed opinions, and the "Get Back" recording sessions could best be described as hell for the Beatles.
It makes the release of 1969's Abbey Road all the more a miracle, and is hands down the best album since Sgt. Pepper. The album can be seen as a culmination of everything they've done so far; the energy of Please Please Me, the creativity of a Hard Day's Night, the varying moods of Rubber Soul & Revolver, and the techniques of Sgt. Pepper. Despite there being one more album, Abbey Road is seen as the last hurrah of the Beatles. Combine that with one of the most iconic record covers of all time, and Abbey Road more than deserves its awards, accolades, and legacy. One of the Beatles' finest.
Best songs: Come Together, Something, Maxwell's Silver Hammer, Oh Darling, Octopus's Garden, Here Comes the Sun, Because, The End
Worst song: Her Majesty

Music Review: The Beatles: Let it Be (3/20/16)
If there is a word to describe the final Beatles album in 1970, it's "bittersweet". The reason is because it's more interesting to look back on 46 years later as opposed to thinking like a fan at the time. Let it Be is vindicated by history as being the group's swansong, but as a followup to the masterpiece of Abbey Road and the end of the Fab Four, it was a disappointment.
In retrospect, it's easy to see why. The mid and late eras of the Beatles were characterized by studio wizardry and mixing as opposed to playing and recording like an actual band. So Paul's idea of foregoing all of that and "getting back to where we once belonged" seemed very appealing. It should be noted though that the original Let it Be recordings happened at the height of all the chaos behind the scenes, and bad attitudes led the shelving of Let it Be. This is why I said last time that Abbey Road's development and release was miraculous, because that album really did seem like the last hurrah where the group came together and made something great.
The final nail in the coffin for Let it Be was the decision of upper management to insert said studio wizardry into the Let it Be recordings to release the album. As a result, what would've been a stand-out album became just another one in the crowd of studio-influenced music. I suppose that's the tragedy of the final album; Abbey Road's shout to the world of their triumphant end...was instead replaced with a quiet whimper that was a symbolization of the end of the Beatles.
But of course, there are still some great and just outstanding songs in the album. It's just such a shame that the historical final album had to end up being rather...average. Yeah, put me in the camp that says Abbey Road was the Beatles' TRUE final album.
Best songs: Two of Us, Dig a Pony, Across the Universe, Let It Be, I've Got a Feeling, The Long and Winding Road, Get Back
Worst songs: Dig It, Maggie Mae, For Your Blue

Movie Review: Batman V Superman: Dawn of Justice (3/28/16)
If this movie was a meal, then the best way to describe it is that it's under-cooked, but also overcooked.
I'm admittedly not a huge DC fan, so I wasn't super-duper excited to watch this, and it was more of the novelty of seeing the two most famous superhero movies on the big screen that drew me in. The two main flaws of this movie are the unnecessary long run time, and how it just kept beating around the bush to get to the main point. Both I think stem from DC's seeming insistence of making their stuff dour and depressing, the characters brooding about their constant issues and arguing about their principles. There's of course nothing wrong with discussing those, but when it just keeps going and going and going and going, it becomes tired and monotonous too quickly.
Hence why I said it's both under-cooked and overcooked. There are A LOT of good things to like about the movie in terms plot and characters, but not enough was done with them. And some of the unnecessary stuff in the grand scheme was given way too much attention than it deserved. These are extremely glaring problems in the movie, so as such I feel that while it's not awful, it's still not particularly good either. Had these problems been rectified, I think this movie could've been great, amazing even. But no, we're just going to have to settle for a less-than-stellar outing for what should've been a monumental occasion for superhero pop culture.

Music Review: The Beatles: Past Masters II (4/1/16)
Just like with Volume One, my ranking of the best-worst singles of Past Masters Volume Two, compiling the ones released between Rubber Soul, and Let it Be. Like the last one, duplicate songs from albums won't be included.
1. Hey Jude
2. Day Tripper
3. Lady Madonna
4. Paperback Writer
5. The Ballad of John and Yoko
6. Don't Let Me Down
7. The Inner Light
8. We Can Work It Out
9. Old Brown Shoe
10. Rain
11. You Know My Name


Movie Review: The Jungle Book 1967 (4/10/16)
Before I watch the live action one, my brief thoughts on the original 1967 Disney classic.
It's...OK, I guess. I admit this was one that I never watched as a kid, and was only really familiar with the Bare Necessities song. While the animal characters are memorable, the animation was good for its time, and its villain was pretty good, I felt that the story was weak and Mowgli the man-cub to be pretty lame and annoying.
Curious to see how this upcoming live-action version will be in comparison to the original, especially since the last two Disney live-action remakes were...mixed, to say the least.

Movie Review: The Jungle Book 2016 (4/10/16)
When I first heard they were doing a live action Disney Jungle Book adaptation, I rolled my eyes. Disney hasn't exactly been wowing people as far as their recent live action adaptations go, so I just didn't care about this. My interest was suddenly piqued when I found about the star-studded cast voicing the animals that included Bill Murray, Ben Kingsley, Scarlet Johannson, Christopher Walken, and Idris Elba. I figured I'd at least see it for their voices, if not for everything else, since I was never that fond of the original animated Jungle Book and never read Kipling's original stories.
But man oh man, this was definitely a surprise. It's as if this movie made up for a lot of the shortcomings of the animated movie. Mowgli the man-cub is actually an interesting and smart character, and the story is actually cohesive and is a clear journey instead of just random moments. All of the major animal characters have their chance to shine, and the villain of Shere Khan (One of the better parts of the animated movie), was made to be even better here. Pile onto that some really good CGI and gorgeous scenery. This is definitely a movie that's great to watch on the big screen, as you can just feel the nature of the jungle in all of its wonders and dangers.
I definitely recommend it. The kids will enjoy the animals, the adults can enjoy the story and scenery, and those who watched the original animated version can have an experience seeing and comparing. And as far as being an adaptation of a previous movie goes, it completely blows Alice in Wonderland, Maleficent, and Cinderella out of the water.

Movie Review: The Angry Birds Movie (5/15/16)
I watched this one mainly out of curiosity than for any actual excitement. I've played my fair share of the game, and it's most certainly fun and enjoyable for what it is. When I heard that it would get a movie, I was sure it was going to be a gigantic bomb. The trailer didn't help matters, inserting a lot of pop songs, emphasizing on slapstick, and constantly milking the same joke again and again: The Red Bird is always angry and miserable things happen to him.
It's no surprise then that practically every single scene in the trailer appears in the 1st half of the movie, which to me was just a gigantic chore and pain to get through. It was infuriating seeing the poor Red Bird suffer throughout that first half because he really seemed like the only sane character in a community of nitwits and jerks. He is constantly ostracized from all the other birds because they are so happy and perfect, while he is...GASP...angry and miserable! Well OF COURSE he's angry! You'd be angry too if you were constantly picked on as a hatchling, abandoned at birth, and being laughed at as an grown bird for being different and having bad things happen to you. The 1st half is just filled with mean-spirited/idiotic characters, insufferable slapstick jokes, toilet humor, boring predictability, shoe-horned pop songs, and just plain idiocy from every character but the Red Bird and the pigs. If this was just going to be the entire movie, I would've downright loathed it for being insulting towards kids' intelligence, a waste of time for the parents, and being a soul-less shill out of a property that had absolutely jack-squat to do with the source material...
...which is why I'm happy for the 2nd half of the movie. Anyone who's played the game knows that the reason they are "angry" birds is because the pigs steal their eggs, and I sure I'm not giving anything away when I say that exactly happens. And sure enough, when they begin to fight back, it...GASP...actually resembles the freaking game! It's like it's a completely different movie! The animation is more fast-paced, the jokes are funnier, it relies less on slapstick, the characters are actually smarter, and the Red Bird is actually looked up to and respected! The 2nd half is what saves this movie from being dreck, and makes it more worthwhile.
All in all, it's satisfying. If you have enough tolerance and patience to get through the 1st half, you'll definitely enjoy the movie for what it is. It's certainly not the garbage that I was expecting it to be, but it's of course far from a masterpiece when we've seen better animated movies out there that can be enjoyed by people of all ages. But I feel that, for the most part, The Angry Birds Movie is not that offensive and is worth to watch just for the 2nd half. The asinine 1st half and the engaging 2nd half to me make this slightly above average for a children's animated movie.

Movie Review: X-Men: Apocalypse (5/23/16)
Jean Grey's comment on Return of the Jedi in this movie is very fitting: "The third one is always the weakest". While X-Men Apocalypse is good, it's certainly far from great or amazing.
I felt that the movie had a problem of trying to focus on what it wanted to do. It was as if they couldn't stay on one thing for too long and kept bouncing around from one plot-point and group of characters to another plot-point and group of characters. The action, while of course good, tended to get arbitrarily interrupted for a slow scene for characters, and while most of the time I appreciate those, in this case they tended to be rather slow and feel like speed bumps.
I'm rather mixed on the villain, since while I don't know much about Apocalypse, I'm aware that in the X-Men mythos he is a massive deal (He is called Apocalypse after all). He certainly looks menacing and has some pretty impressive powers, but he didn't really start showing off until the very end, and even then I wish he could've done more. There's also one scene in the movie that I'm very conflicted on, because while it's a great scene, it did feel like it went on longer than necessary, and felt extremely shoehorned in the movie. We could've taken that out to allow more time for the movie to iron out its problems.
Now what did I like? The story is nice, the characters were neat, and all the actors did well. McAvoy's Professor Xavier continues his evolution into the mentor figure we know him as. You really feel for Fassbender's Magneto here, the poor guy just can't catch a break, and it's a good step in his character arc. Lawerence as Mystique was once again great, if a bit underutilized. And all the newcomer cast for the iconic X-Men played their parts well.
All in all, while I feel it to be the worst of the new X-Men trilogy that started with First Class and continued with Days of Future Past, I certainly don't' feel it to be bad. It's still enjoyable for audiences who want to see more X-Men, and for the fans who want to see the next chapter. I just find it funny that this new X-Men trilogy has repeated the original one with the first one being fine, the second better, and the third one sub-par. But hey, X-Men: Apocalypse is still miles above X-Men: The Last Stand, so that's a start.

Thursday, June 2, 2016

Facebook Archive 2015

Next on my archive are my Facebook reviews from 2015. Why did I skip 2014? Well, that the most active year of the old blog when FB posts were just basically previews for the more in-depth blog posts. 2015, as I said previously, was when the blog's activity started to decline, so here you go.


Movie Review: The Avengers: Age of Ultron (5/12/15)
A few weeks too late, I finally watched Avengers: Age of Ultron.
A great action movie that appeals to both standard moviegoers who want to see some high octane action, and fans like myself who have been following these Marvel movies from the very beginning. On top of that it has a really good story and character drama that allows us to get more invested in these characters.
It's hard to top the first Avengers, but this one managed to do it in my opinion. Review on the blog will be up as soon as possible.

Movie Review: Ant-Man (7/18/15)
Another hit for Marvel, though how much of a hit it is depends on your personal taste. Personally I liked it; likeable protagonists, good action, great usage of special effects, and a seemingly small, but big story.
Full thoughts, and more, will be on the blog, resurrected from the dead after half a year of absence.

Movie review: Mission Impossible: Rogue Nation (8/3/15)
Watched it yesterday.
I've never seen the first three movies, only the 4th and this most recent one, and I feel that your fondness for this depends on how you feel about the Mission Impossible formula, as it has what you expect: The typical Tom Cruise stuff, gadgets, high speed chases, conspiracy, action, etc.
All in all, it's adequate.

Movie review: Inside Out (8/21/15)
Thank you Pixar for showing (and reminding) us why you're such a powerhouse.
After a rather dry spell with the awful Cars 2, the uneven Brave, and the mixed Monsters University, Inside Out once again shows us how Pixar works best when it turns simple ideas into high concepts. A masterful mixture of story, characters, animation, and of course emotions, is perfectly blended to create what I feel is Pixar's best standalone movie. To find any bad in this movie to me is nitpicking. I can't think of anything I didn't particularly disliked. I loved all of it.
I definitely recommend it for everyone to see, though I implore parents who will bring their kids to try and keep them well behaved. One annoying, noisy kid nearly ruined it for me, and I'm very thankful that the movie was so good that it was able to keep my attention and drown out distractions.

Movie review: Pixels (8/29/15)
I feel that a lot of the beef towards the movie comes from the trailer being a complete lie, and Adam Sandler himself. How much you like or can tolerate the man depends on you, because while everything relating to the video games was great, Adam Sandler's presence and his movie quirks are present, despite it being more low key than usual
Overall I feel it to be average. While it was entertaining in its own way, I can only imagine how much better it could have been if it was able to be a full video game movie without being interrupted by "Adam Sandler-isms".

Movie review: The Hunger Games: Mockingjay Part 1 (11/15/15)
Just saw this now and never caught it on its initial release.
I feel a lot of the criticism towards the movie in regards to a lack of action or things just being setup disappears if it's seen back to back or shortly before Part 2. As for book comparisons, I never have read the books so I'm just taking this as it is: Not as good as Catching Fire, but provides good setup and gets everything ready for an all out experience for the final movie this week.

Movie review: The Hunger Games: Mockingjay Part 2 (11/22/15)
Before I give my full thoughts, let me sum up the movie in one word:
Meh.
On the whole it felt really unbalanced, with scenes of conversation going on longer than they should have, or scenes where stuff actually happens not being long enough. It's like it didn't know how to balance the character bits and the action bits by overcompensating in one area and lacking in the other.
It only really got good by the climax, and even then it felt unbalanced, with a mix of effective and ineffective twists. As a movie on its own it was OK, but for the final Hunger Games movie, I certainly wasn't satisfied.
Admittedly that could just be my own expectations since I never read the books, but considering that Mockingjay Part 1 was supposed to be the setup, I think its fair to want Mockingjay Part 2 be where everything goes down and comes to a head. But with still so much setting up and characters just doing nothing but repeating what we know, this movie might as well have been called Mockingjay Part 1.5. The imbalance of the movie's plot, and the stigma of it being the final one, sadly makes this the weakest of the entire series.
In the end, I'm glad I watched these movies and thank Amanda Nepomuceno for introducing me to the series. I just wish it would've ended better.

Movie review: The Good Dinosaur (11/26/15)
Though not to the same level as Inside Out, Pixar's latest entry manages to do just fine by relying on its atmosphere, chemistry between the two main characters, animation, and taking a simple story and making it grand.
Have tissues on standby, per the Pixar norm.

Movie review: Star Wars Episode IV: A New Hope (12/13/15)
38 years since its release, and it's still a classic that holds up today. What it may lack compared to the later two original movies or its prequels makes up for with a sense of atmosphere. Apart from watching this one first because it's the one that started it all, it can really suck you into that galaxy far far away and get you primed up for the rest of the movies to come.
4 more days...just 4 more days....

Movie review: Star Wars Episode V: The Empire Strikes Back (12/14/15)
Watching it again after so long reaffirms that that this is hands down the best Star Wars movie of all of them.
Writing, Directing, Music, Effects, and Story really came together for this one, the end result being the film that shakes up the status quo and in my opinion is the one laid the groundwork for the future of Star Wars.
Next time however I won't be watching Return of the Jedi. Time to move from the best movie...to what is considered the worst.

Movie review: Star Wars Episode I: The Phantom Menace (12/14/15)
While it is most definitely the weakest of the movies, I don't think it's the god-awful piece of garbage that people love to make it out as.
In my opinion, if you have a high tolerance for some of the more obnoxious things in the movie, there's still enough good in it to make it worthwhile.

Movie review: Star Wars Episode II: Attack of the Clones (12/16/15)
Re-watching this one, I came to a startling realization.
I actually found this worse than The Phantom Menace, and it's because of one thing: The Anakin-Padme romance plot with its awful dialogue, Christensen's & Portman's badly directed acting, and it constantly interrupting everything else. Everything else I like in the movie fine, but the romance in this movie was just...blegh. While there's so much more to like in this one than in Episode I, the horrendous execution of the Anakin-Padme romance is just so palpable that it just engulfs everything, like the Dark Side of the Force.
I admit it could be because I just didn't see fully recognize this when I was a teen back when it came out and I've seen better romance plots since then, but I don't know...

Movie review: Star Wars Episode III: Revenge of the Sith (12/19/15)
Before my thoughts on Episode VII, my thoughts on Episode III.
Even though it has its issues, it has much more good in it than the other two and hands down the best movie of the Prequel Trilogy. It's a tragedy, brings things full circle to where they'll eventually begin in the first Star Wars, and also has a sense of atmosphere that really gives it a feeling of dread. It is after all the first PG-rated Star Wars movie.
The romance of Anakin, and Padme, a major point of contention for me in Attack of the Clones, is still cringe-worthy. However, in this movie at least they do something important with it. Combine that with a very exciting and climactic final act, and overall, it makes for a good time. Even though from a critical standpoint the best of the prequels still doesn't measure up the original trilogy, personally this ties with Empire Strikes Back as my favorite Star Wars movie.
One more movie left to watch, Episode VI, before the awakening...

Movie review: Star Wars Episode VI: Return of the Jedi (12/19/15)
Before my thoughts on Episode VII, my thoughts on Episode VI.
For the longest time until 1999, this was considered the original "bad" Star Wars, because of various aspects of the movie like the 30 minutes of Jabba the Hutt, the Ewoks, and a rather poor pace that starts and moves very slow until the climax.
Re-watching it again after all this time, I can agree with some of that, but I feel that some of the good bits along with one of the best climaxes of the movies make up for it. I think it also helps that this was written with being the end of a chapter in mind, as throughout the movie there's a sense of finality to it.
Another thing that makes me like this all the more is because when I started out this marathon, I watched it in the flashback order: IV-V-I-II-III-VI. Seeing the prequels and Anakin's story right before Return of the Jedi makes it even stronger, as we see the end of Luke's rise to a hero and the end and redemption of Darth Vader.
My final scores of the 6 movies will be posted tomorrow...after the awakening.

Movie review: Star Wars Episode VII: The Force Awakens (12/21/15)
Finally, to finish my brief looks at the Star Wars movies...the latest, Episode VII.
Today was actually the second time I watched it, because the first time I watched it, I of course loved it. Seeing it a second time allowed me to be a little more critical and analytical of the movie, seeing again after the initial hype has passed and now its slowly creeping into our minds as part of Star Wars.
Seeing it again, I find myself still liking it. Without going into spoilers, I feel that the movie did a fantastic job in bringing back the magic of Star Wars and reminding us why we loved it in the first place. It has a perfect balance of old elements and new elements to please everyone, from the man who was first enthralled by this galaxy far far away in 1977, to the son of such a man who's being exposed to this franchise the first time in 2015. The characters, the effects, the plot twists, and a lot of great scenes definitely make for a movie that can possible give the earlier movies a run for their money.
There are some things I didn't particularly like, but without going into spoilers again, let's just say you might be flashing back to a certain Star Wars movie often. And I felt that the music was extremely underwhelming, especially for the guy who has composed all six movies before this one.
However, they don't detract much from the movie for me. I'm glad to have seen it twice, I'm happy that I'm fully back with Star Wars again, I await owning Episode VII on DVD, and I await Episode VIII and IX with great anticipation.
I'll post my individual scores of all 7 movies later.

Star Wars Follow-Up (12/21/15)
My final scores of the (now) 7 main Star Wars movies. These are relative to each other, meaning that I'm judging them just as Star Wars movies, and not in the grand, nebulous quality of worldwide cinema. I'm not comparing a Star Wars to, say, Hunger Games.
Anyway...
EPISODE IV: A NEW HOPE (4.5/5)-A classic movie and a great start even 40 years later. Its primary flaws are in some of the sometimes hokey acting of Mark Hamill and Carrie Fisher, but they're overlooked because everything else is so good.
EPISODE V: THE EMPIRE STRIKES BACK (5/5)-The Best Star Wars movie of them all. It does what any second act should do magnificently: Put our heroes through a hellish struggle after their first triumph, and end on a note that makes us yearn for more. Effects, music, story and cinematography all come together here. Add the introduction of a new iconic character, and one of the biggest twists in cinema history, and you have a movie that could do no wrong.
EPISODE VI: RETURN OF THE JEDI (4/5)-A satisfying conclusion to the original trilogy, though story wise it's rather unbalanced. Jabba's stuff in the first 30 minutes and the Ewoks later on seem like they go on and on depending on how much you're invested. It's made up for by the climax of Luke's final battle with Darth Vader and the space battle to end all space battles. Furthermore, how much this movie makes an emotional impact could depend on the order you watch the other movies.
EPISODE I: THE PHANTOM MENACE (2.5/5)-While most say this is the worst of them all, I find it just average. Jar Jar Binks's shtick can get pretty insufferable, and the politics in play can be seen as a waste of time. I feel that this is made up for by other aspects such as Ewan McGregor, the Podrace, the grand sweeping nature of the new environments, the final lightsaber battle, and John William's "Duel of the Fates".
EPISODE II: ATTACK OF THE CLONES (2/5)-To me, the WORST Star Wars movie, and for one reason: Anakin's and Padme's romance. This is definitive proof of George Lucas's flaws as a writer and director, as the dialogue and acting of this romance sink to the levels of bad soap operas, and made worse by the fact that its false drama: You KNOW that despite their blabbering of forbidden love, living a lie, and being tortured, they'll get together anyway. The fact that this major non-issue dominates half the movie just makes it such a pain to get through. Everything else in the movie is fine and great, but its drowned by this sappy-middle school play level of YA romantic fiction.
EPISODE III: REVENGE OF THE SITH (3.5/5)-The best of the prequels and my personal second favorite Star Wars movie. Despite the romance of Anakin and Padme still being a driving force, at least they do something important with it because of its tragic nature. As the movie that's meant to be the beginnings of Episode IV, this does it fairly well. The tragedy of seeing how things end for this era of Star Wars chronology gives it a sense of atmosphere not seen since Episode V. Though it is still flawed, it has enough good in it to make it the most watchable of the prequels.
EPISODE VII: THE FORCE AWAKENS (4/5)-A very effective and masterful start to this new era. Old and New mesh perfectly together to satisfy just about everyone who's seen it. The cinematography, the story, the energy of the new actors, and the legacy and gravitas of the old characters make for a wonderful time and reminds us all of why we loved Star Wars in the first place, why this franchise has been going on for almost 40 years in many different forms of media. Its flaws are primarily in the music and a feeling of repetition, but with a few exceptions, they're not to the movies determent. It'll make you leave the movie yearning for more, which is the sign that the movie has succeeded.
MAY THE FORCE BE WITH US ALL for the future and whatever will come next!

Tuesday, May 31, 2016

Facebook Archive 2013

Next up on the archive list are select musings from my Facebook, some of which were before I started the original blog, from 2013-Present. 2013, looking back, seems to be the point where I started picking up movie reviewing, and it was in fact the last entry of this archive that motivated me to take it to the next level.

Movie review: Iron Man 3 (4/24/2013)
All in all, pretty good. Without going into spoilers, there are definitely some unexpected surprises. Some parts are little dragging, but it makes up for it in other areas. It's definitely a different film from Iron Man 1 and 2.
Can't wait till November. Bring on Thor: The Dark World!

Movie review: Star Trek Into Darkness (5/19/2013)
Because I didn't keep up with pre-release info like I usually do for big movies I like, I didn't know about the plot before walking into the theater. I think it was good I didn't look up the movie beforehand because I thought the movie was REALLY good. The plot was interesting, all the characters were well done, and plot twists and the climax really got me at the edge of my seat.

Movie review: Monsters University (6/30/2013)
Anybody who liked the first Monsters Inc will certainly like this one as well. I personally wouldn't put it in the "high" class of Pixar films, but I find it better than the last two Pixar movies; better than Brave, and A LOT better than Cars 2.
4/5.

Movie review: The Wolverine (7/26/2013)
I'm not much of a Wolverine fan, and I don't like how he hogs the spotlight in X-Men stories, but this movie made him interesting for me. It helps that this isn't a prequel but rather a sequel to all the other X-Men movies so it gives you an understanding of the interpersonal conflict Wolverine is facing. The plot is a little bit confusing but by the end it makes sense.
Also, and I cannot stress this enough, STAY IN YOUR SEAT UNTIL AFTER THE MAIN CREDITS, especially if you watched any of the previous X-Men movies.

Movie review: The Artist (7/28/2013)
I wish I caught the movie from the beginning because it really was interesting. The idea of using the plot of "Singin in the Rain" and taking a serious look at it really shows how hard silent film-era actors had it once movies had sound. It was a nice touch for it to be in black and white with no sound and dialogue with only music, exactly like a real Silent movie.
I recommend it just for one of those emotional movies as well as appreciating what movies used to be like when our grandparents were growing up.

Movie review: Dragon Ball Z: Battle of Gods (8/14/2013)
Not much I can comment on, but for DBZ fans, it's a treat. The real draw is watching it on a big screen, and that really enhanced the experience. The bigger budget allowed for more impressive looking fights. Definitely worth it.

Movie review: Thor the Dark World (10/30/2013)
Pretty good, better than the first IMO because it brings in all these mystical and fantastical elements that's associated with a property like Thor, whereas the first movie was grounded more in reality. There were a ton of funny moments, and the climax was very pumping and creative.
Oh and for those who don't know the tradition yet: Stay until the very end of the movie for the mandatory special scene after the credits.

Movie review: The Hunger Games: Catching Fire (11/24/2013)
I never watched the first movie in theaters, and was introduced to the movie by my sister as a recommendation, so I got hooked and was one of those anticipating the sequel. But I never got around to watching trailers, keeping with the hype or reading the books, as I wanted to be surprised and going in guessing, as well as not be hindered by any differences from the books.
Catching Fire was an excellent follow-up, and it surpassed the first movie by miles. It's like The Empire Strikes Back and the original Star Wars. It manages to introduce new story elements while it seemingly may rehash some from the first movie, but with a big twist. A lot of the story developments happened here that deals with what happened by the end of the first movie and goes beyond what the first movie really was; children killing children amidst a building conspiracy. Now that we have that conspiracy played out, the story moved forward and went into unexpected places. Problems from the first movie like the dizzying shaky camera, slow pace, Jennifer Lawerence's lack of facial emotion, and the confusing "alliance of convenience" were ironed out in Catching Fire as well.
One problem I have is the abrupt ending and confusing climax, but I'm pretty sure that'll be resolved later on. 9/10, loved it, looking forward to the third and final part of the Hunger Games trilogy...except that I heard that the third book, Mockingjay, will be divided into parts, just like Twilight: Breaking Dawn and Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows before it. Sigh...

Movie review: Frozen (11/29/2013)
I make it a point to watch new Disney movies now because as a kid when I was growing up during the time of the "classics" of the 90's, I was too young to fully appreciate them and just liked the basic kids stuff. Watching them later as an adult I can understand the story, themes, characters and music that go into them. So now I take that stance when I watch current Disney movies too.
But as for Frozen? LOVED IT LOVED IT LOVED IT LOVED IT LOVED IT.
I've never seen or heard of the original fairy tale this is based on: "The Snow Queen" by Hans Christan Andersen, so I don't know or care how fully faithful it is. All I know is that this was a GREAT Disney movie and regular movie in general. I loved the story, the characters, the themes, the music, and even the animation. But what makes this an especially good Disney movie is that while it sticks to the traditional Disney elements that we all know, it also deviates at certain points for a new experience.
I won't spoil the full details because you should see it for yourself, but I'll give basic stuff:
Story: Revolves around two (Yes, TWO) princess characters, siblings Anna and Elsa. Elsa is gifted/cursed with magical ice powers, so when she runs away after unknowingly causing a catastrophic blizzard, Anna joins with ice deliverer Kristoff and snowman Olaf to bring her back. The story later goes in unexpected places with plenty of plot twists, making for a satisfying conclusion to the movie.
Themes: It's hard to go into this without spoiling, and you should find the themes yourself. When you do find out the theme of the movie, you'll definitely appreciate it more and like how it went down a different path than what you were expecting.
Music: I really liked the songs in these movies. Some more than others, but they all stood out and none of them are bad in the general sense. There are enough songs to remember and hum to yourself while there aren't too many songs that it becomes dragging. The best song in the movie in my opinion is a tossup between "For the First Time in Forever" and "Let it Go".
Animation:I don't usually pay much attention to animation styles because what matters to me is if I'm entertained by everything else. But I got to give praise to the animation. It looks GORGEOUS. All the snow, ice and scenery make for great images. Even if you traditionally do not like CGI movies, this follows the same style of Tangled in that it does remind you of traditional animation.
All around this was just amazing and definitely one of my movie highlights this year. Out of 5, I give it a perfect 5. There was nothing I particularly disliked, and there was so much I liked. I give it a recommendation for everyone to watch, be they your kids, your significant other, or your family.

Sunday, May 29, 2016

From the Couch to the Cinema: Archive 2015

Before new material will be posted, I want to compile my old material from the old blog Next, my posts from 2015.

Chinese New Year Special: My Top 14 Fictional Horses (2/10/15)
http://couchci.blogspot.com/2015/02/chinese-new-year-special-part-1-my-top.html

Movie review: Into the Woods (2/13/15)
http://couchci.blogspot.com/2015/02/cinema-into-woods.html

Movie review: Fifty Shades of Grey (2/19/15)
http://couchci.blogspot.com/2015/02/cinema-fifty-shades-of-grey.html

Chinese New Year Special: My Top 15 Fictional Goats/Sheep/Rams (2/27/2015)
http://couchci.blogspot.com/2015/02/chinese-new-year-special-part-2-my-top.html

Movie review: Inside Out (8/23/15)
http://couchci.blogspot.com/2015/08/cinema-inside-out.html

Wednesday, May 25, 2016

From the Couch to the Cinema: Archive 2014

Before new material will be posted, I want to compile my old material from the old blog. First, my posts from 2014.

Movie review: The Lego Movie (2/8/2014)
http://couchci.blogspot.com/2014/02/the-lego-movie.html

Movie review: Saving Mr. Banks (2/27/2014)
http://couchci.blogspot.com/2014/02/cinema-saving-mr-banks.html

Movie review: Mr. Peabody & Sherman (3/6/2014)
http://couchci.blogspot.com/2014/03/cinema-mr-peabody-sherman.html

Movie review: Muppets Most Wanted (3/21/2014)
http://couchci.blogspot.com/2014/03/cinema-muppets-most-wanted.html

Movie review: Captain America: The Winter Soldier (3/29/2014)
http://couchci.blogspot.com/2014/03/cinema-captain-america-winter-soldier.html

Movie review: Godzilla 2014 (5/17/2014)
http://couchci.blogspot.com/2014/05/cinema-godzilla-2014.html

Movie review: X-Men: Days of Future Past (5/24/2014)
http://couchci.blogspot.com/2014/05/cinema-x-men-days-of-future-past.html

Movie review: Maleficent (5/31/2014)
http://couchci.blogspot.com/2014/05/cinema-maleficent.html

Movie review: How to Train Your Dragon 2 (6/12/2014)
http://couchci.blogspot.com/2014/06/cinema-how-to-train-your-dragon-2.html

Movie review: Gone With The Wind (6/13/2014)
http://couchci.blogspot.com/2014/06/couch-gone-with-wind.html

Movie review: Bicentennial Man (7/29/2014)
http://couchci.blogspot.com/2014/07/couch-bicentennial-man.html

Movie review: Guardians of the Galaxy (8/4/2014)
http://couchci.blogspot.com/2014/08/cinema-guardians-of-galaxy.html

Movie review: Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles 2014 (8/15/2014)
http://couchci.blogspot.com/2014/08/cinema-teenage-mutant-ninja-turtles-2014.html

TV review: Doctor Who 34X1: Deep Breath (8/24/2014)
http://couchci.blogspot.com/2014/08/couch-doctor-who-new-series-8season-34.html

TV review: Doctor Who 34X2: Into the Dalek (9/1/2014)
http://couchci.blogspot.com/2014/09/couch-doctor-who-new-series-8season-34_1.html

TV review: Doctor Who 34X3: Robot of Sherwood (10/3/2014)
http://couchci.blogspot.com/2014/10/couch-doctor-who-new-series-8season-34.html

TV review: Doctor Who 34X4: Listen (10/3/2014)
http://couchci.blogspot.com/2014/10/couch-doctor-who-new-series-8season-34_3.html

TV review: Doctor Who 34X5: Time Heist (10/3/2014)
http://couchci.blogspot.com/2014/10/couch-doctor-who-new-series-8season-34_75.html

TV review: Doctor Who 34X6: The Caretaker (10/3/2014)
http://couchci.blogspot.com/2014/10/couch-doctor-who-new-series-8season-34_61.html

TV review: Doctor Who 34X7: Kill the Moon (10/6/2014)
http://couchci.blogspot.com/2014/10/couch-doctor-who-new-series-8season-34_6.html

TV review: Doctor Who 34X8: Mummy on the Orient Express (10/18/2014)
http://couchci.blogspot.com/2014/10/couch-doctor-who-new-series-8season-34_18.html

TV review: Doctor Who 34X9: Flatline (10/24/2014)
http://couchci.blogspot.com/2014/10/couch-doctor-who-new-series-8season-34_24.html

TV review: Doctor Who 34X10: In The Forest of The Night (10/28/2014)
http://couchci.blogspot.com/2014/10/couch-doctor-who-new-series-8season-34_28.html

Movie review: The Shining (Halloween 2014)
http://couchci.blogspot.com/2014/10/special-halloween-review-shining-1980.html

TV review: Doctor Who 34X11: Dark Water (11/6/2014)
http://couchci.blogspot.com/2014/11/couch-doctor-who-new-series-8season-34.html

TV review: Doctor Who 34X12: Death in Heaven (11/12/2014)
http://couchci.blogspot.com/2014/11/couch-doctor-who-new-series-8season-34_12.html

Movie review: Big Hero 6 (11/23/2014)
http://couchci.blogspot.com/2014/11/cinema-disneys-big-hero-6.html

Movie review: Beauty & The Beast: The Enchanted Christmas (Christmas Eve 2014)
http://couchci.blogspot.com/2014/12/special-christmas-review-beauty-beast.html